LSAT PrepTest 20 Logic Game 2 Full Tutorial (Questions 6-12)
A full tutorial of Logic Game 2 from LSAT PrepTest 20, administered in October 1996.
If you found this helpful, please visit my website at for LSAT-related blog posts, content updates, and information about private tutoring!
hey guys tell me if R implies no N, why in case 4 we have R and N together in column 2? why does case 4 exist? EDIT: oh i got it! its because column 2 has elements that are not to be reduced so, it doesn't matter weather or not are they together.
Will you explain step number 6….
everyone here is a girl. is that what law school is like?
Number 12 made my head explode
#10 almost killed me. Thank you
I don’t understand why D is wrong for 11. I certainly under why C is correct but D seems correct also, can you have in: M R G S W and out: L P N. Doesn’t the L P rule allow for both L and P to be out? I can’t figure it out please help
Would you mind explaining how can gpsw go in the second bottom graph that doesn't have a square? If gpsw go there, wouldn't that break the rule that only 5 are to be reduced? This #10 also got me very confused. Not sure if you have a better way of explaining it. Like how are we supposed to know we should repeat the LMR and get another 2 additonal results? Thx
Use proper language