LSAT Blog – PrepTest 55 Logic Game 4 – Shuttle Van (October 2008)
LSAT Unplugged & Law School Admissions Podcast
Views: 3775
Like: 28
shuttle van lsat logic game PrepTest 55 October 2008 LSAT
Watch more free videos like this at:
02.10.2021
3 Comments
For question 20, wouldn't R already be able to get off at M because the rule states that R could get off at or after M? In other words, I was able to eliminate C without 'proving it' per say because the rule stated it which allowed me to go faster.
It's much easier to have each variable set in lower case/upper case. I think you could've labeled M before r as M-r or M on top of r. Makes it fit the diagram easier.
For question 20, wouldn't R already be able to get off at M because the rule states that R could get off at or after M? In other words, I was able to eliminate C without 'proving it' per say because the rule stated it which allowed me to go faster.
It's much easier to have each variable set in lower case/upper case. I think you could've labeled M before r as M-r or M on top of r. Makes it fit the diagram easier.
One of the most difficult games I have encountered, wow.